I can't go back to yesterday because I was a different person then
~Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland~
The second module of the Certificate in Research was
entitled Research Philosophy. Where do I even start?
Unlike the other course—Research Methods, from the Passion
blog—we did not have an intense week of vignettes. Rather, this was an intense
week of reading, self-reflection, and quite a lot of big words that were
difficult to pronounce and sometimes understand. Of course there were still
lecture sessions, but now they were three hours long and the group work never
seemed to stop. I started the week a little worried as the course does have a rather
odd reputation on campus. At the very least it is recognized as a necessary
evil.
I was not impressed with the four pre-readings for two
reasons: (1) there were four of them (I did have other work to do) and none of
them a few pages long and (2) was I really supposed to understand them all? Now
I love reading, especially things that catch my attention, I can relate to or
are well written so I did get through two of them. But two paragraphs into the
third one and I felt like Morpheus was trying to make me choose between the
blue or red pill to see how far the rabbit hole went. Whoops! Just a tad too
much for me!! In addition to the pre-readings,
when I looked at the schedule there appeared to be one or several readings for each
session (talk about overload; I really felt like a student.)
I was therefore pleasantly surprised to enjoy the few
sessions we had. Moreover, I really enjoyed the group sessions during the week.
They allowed us (the students) to learn from each other, talk through what we
had learnt, what we didn’t understand and kinda muddle through it together.
Now, about the teaching sessions in more detail… sigh. These
sessions were thought provoking, interesting, befuddling at times and sometimes
fun. Please do not think this story will have a typical ending i.e. expect poor
session but it turned out to be great …no no no… this story has a totally
different emphasis. Let me focus on the thought provoking part of the week. Have
you ever asked yourself:
- · What is reality?
- · How do I view reality?
- · Are there multiple realities?
- · Does the reality of a situation change for the same person?
- · What is the truth?
- · How do I know that something is the truth?
- · Are there several truths?
- · Does the truth change according to the perspective of the viewer, thinker or individual?
- · Is the truth the same no matter whose point of view it is seen from?
These are the types of questions that were being tossed at
us (almost carelessly) during that week. The answers to these questions, or
rather our answers to these questions or our point of view would apparently make
it easier for us to determine our philosophical positions as it relates to
research.
Seriously?!? Who thinks about this stuff? Who wants to do this
much self-examination? What was I doing here? Was getting a PhD supposed to
make me examine myself and my beliefs? Even scarier: were these questions
really that difficult? For some persons I am sure the answers would come very
easily because everything in their lives is so clear-cut and sure. But right
now, right then especially in the face of all these differing perspectives,
what did I really think? What was I sure of? What did I believe?
What do you believe?
Sigh… all this thinking is exhausting. Anyway … the week
went by, I believe I participated and I know I learnt something. Words like
ontology, epistemology and methodology all became a little clearer; I even
think I get interpretivism and positivism. Unfortunately that didn’t mean that
I knew the answers to the hard questions or that I was ready to complete the
assignment which essentially requires my answers by January.
What
do you think? What is the truth?